<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>To-Do-Lists on Time Blokker</title><link>https://timeblokker.com/tags/to-do-lists/</link><description>Recent content in To-Do-Lists on Time Blokker</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://timeblokker.com/tags/to-do-lists/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The problem with to-do lists (and what to do instead)</title><link>https://timeblokker.com/blog/the-problem-with-to-do-lists-and-what-to-do-instead/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://timeblokker.com/blog/the-problem-with-to-do-lists-and-what-to-do-instead/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Eight items on your to-do list. Looks manageable. You&amp;rsquo;ll knock it out.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But one of those items takes three hours, and you&amp;rsquo;ve got four hours left today. Another takes 90 minutes. Two more take an hour each. The list never mentioned any of that. It just showed you eight lines and let you believe eight lines meant eight quick things.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is the core problem with to-do lists, and it took me years to see it clearly: a list has no time dimension. It counts tasks, not minutes. Eight items could be 40 minutes of work or 12 hours, and the list presents both the same way.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>